The decade-long fight to study the effects preferential admission programs and who takes and passes the California bar has ended, for now.
The California Supreme Court, without comment, declined to review an appellate decision that disclosing bar admissions data would require the bar to create new records, a duty the California Public Records Act doesn’t impose.
Wednesday’s ruling is the latest in the fight between UCLA law professor Richard Sander and the state bar. Sander and the First Amendment Coalition seek individually unidentifiable California bar exam data to study the effects that race-based preferential admission programs have on higher education ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.