Bloomberg Law
April 24, 2019, 2:09 PM UTC

No Class Arbitration When Agreement Silent, High Court Says

Perry Cooper
Perry Cooper
Reporter

An ambiguous agreement can’t be the basis for concluding parties agreed to class arbitration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled April 24.

The case asked the court to consider if classwide arbitration is allowed when the arbitration agreement doesn’t expressly permit or forbid it.

Lamps Plus employee Frank Varela filed the case as a class action after his personal information was shared by a fellow employee who fell for a phishing attack. The company sought to resolve the case in individual arbitration, but the courts agreed with Varela that state contract law authorized class arbitration.

The case is Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, U.S., No. 17-988, 4/24/19

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn About Bloomberg Law

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.